Recording: Practical Strategies for AI in the Classroom (Quick Study Live)
53
Points It is difficult to know what the comments are you are responding to. It would be helpful for you to read the comments out loud for those of us watching the recording.
Our university is adding Grammarly, and in the training it showed how students can put in a sentence of their topic and get an entire outline for them in an instant. While I love their feature of spell check, grammar, etc., having a framed work given to students is troubling. Clearly, we are blurring lines and redefining what is and is not plagiarism.
Should we be requiring students to cite the AI program they are using? If so, what would such a citation look like? It seems there is still much to work out before rolling out AI unilaterally.
-
1124
Points
369
Coins
Yes. There certainly is a thin line between issues, specially when your Institution policy on the use of AI by the student is vague. They do have a Students Rights and Responsibilities Manual that addresses the do’s and dont’s of AI use. I take this as an open door for faculty to make decisions.. , but as mentioned in this discussion, the rapid evolution of AI is mind-blowing.
I require citations. You can easily find current examples on the web.
In my opinion, AI use in education is currently super complicated. I am finding that my text’s OER continues to provide current assistance and tools that relate to the current issues that educators face with AI.
Log in to reply.